Skip to content


An opportunity to convert the long off-season into the most interesting tourism season, the initiative to form a monsoon tourism Board is on…

TTF – Kolkata, Netaji Indoor Stadium. 02nd Day. 01st August, 2010. 11:00hrs to 13:00hrs.
Media Seminar: Tourism Speciality Product, Indian Monsoons (An EHTTOA Initiative).
Organized by Fair Fest Media and Eastern Himalaya Travel & Tour Operators’ Association.

Background: Very few places in the world witness a monsoon season similar to the Indian Peninsula and Malayan Peninsula. The origin of this monsoon and departure every year is a happening, which has not only blessed these two peninsulas with a unique biodiversity, but in the Indian peninsula it has been a motivation for creation of a special culture.

Monsoons in India have made a place in mythology, religion, music, food and literature. It also has been abundantly filmed for Bollywood movies. Several festivals and social rituals like marriages occur during this period. Other than popular agriculture, the country runs plantation and forestry programs during this period. The most happening and lively months of the year in the Indian subcontinent is during the monsoon season.

The word ‘Monsoon’ is believed to be first used in English in British India, presently India, Bangladesh and Pakistan. The origin probably comes from the Urdu or North Indian word used for weather ‘Mausam’. Strengthening of the Asian Monsoon comes with the rise of the Tibetan Plateau after the collision of the Indian subcontinent with the Asia 50 million years ago. The Southwest Monsoon or popularly Indian Monsoon is expected to start towards the beginning of June and fade away to the end of September.

The Thar Desert along with Central and Northern Indian subcontinent heats up in summer, which causes low pressure in the area. The moisture laden winds from the Indian Ocean rushes in to fill up the void, but at the southernmost tip of the Indian peninsula, it divides into two, the Arabian Sea Branch and the Bay of Bengal Branch. The first is interrupted by the Western Ghats, bringing the first Southwest Monsoons to the state of Kerala, and continues to move northwards bringing precipitation along the coastal areas like Goa.

The Bay of Bengal branch moves toward West Bengal, Bangladesh, Northeastern states of India and precipitates in the East Himalaya, moving westwards to the Gangetic areas. This monsoons brings in fresh life originating from the East Himalaya. This is believed to be the strongest monsoons to the world. Some places in the East Himalaya like Mawsynram and Cherrapunji are known to be the wettest places on earth.

Several initiatives have been taken in the past to promote monsoon tourism, but this is the first time an organized tourism product platform is being launched with the hope that this will be followed by formation of a ‘Monsoon Tourism Board’ being initiated by EHTTOA (Eastern Himalaya Travel and Tour Operators’ Association) and Fair Fest Media, the organizers of the most elaborate and popular Travel Mart in India.

To join please return with suggestions here or send suggestions to actraj@gmail.com.

Raj, celebrating rains and bandhs in the East Himalaya…

http://actraj.blogspot.com/

Knowledge sharing options:
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Add to favorites

Posted in Bangladesh, Cooperation and network, Events, India, Sustainability.

Community-based Sustainable Tourism

1. Project name: Community-based Sustainable Tourism

2. Project area: Phobjikha, Bhutan

3. Project linkage to national priorities, action plans, and programs:
Bhutan has ratified the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) on 25 August 19951. The Sustainable Development Agreement with Netherlands and other bilateral and international contracts bind the country to take necessary steps in fulfilling its share in the preservation of biodiversity and the environment. The Integrated Conservation and Development Program (ICDP) concept is based on the Royal Government of Bhutan’s policies of biodiversity conservation, rural economic development and decentralization. The 73rd session of the National Assembly (1995) ruled that the country must maintain not less than 60% of its area under forest cover. In its move towards conservation, the Royal Government of Bhutan (RGoB) has established a system of protected areas, which cover 26% of its area.

Simultaneously, The RGoB emphasizes the need to enhance the economy of the not only the communities that live within but also those lying on the periphery and outside the protected areas system and calls for public participation in conservation.

4. Project rationale:
Phobjikha is increasingly becoming a favored destination for most tourists and national visitors alike. This has come with the challenge of maintaining and conserving the biodiversity and ecological richness of the valley that is becoming vulnerable to anthropogenic interventions. The valley encompasses one of the biggest habitats for the globally endangered Black-necked Cranes, which is one of the main attractions for visitors. With easy access and relatively light conservation rules and regulations in the area, (as compared to national parks) conserving this birds and its habitat has become a major challenge for conservation organizations.

In such a scenario, local people play a major role in the future of environment conservation in the area. Therefore integrating community needs with conservation objectives has become crucial for success of conservation. Alternative programs like the community-based sustainable tourism (CBST) offers livelihood choices that is extremely important in the context of current situation where tourism is increasing inevitably in the area.

Economically, local people in Phobjikha still depend heavily on potato cultivation, which generates one time annual income. The national tourism policy characterized by fixed tariffs has failed to bring direct benefit to the local communities. CBST has the potential to bring the benefit directly to people at the grassroots level.

Download the full report from 2007 here .

This article is quoted from Tourism ROY Newsletter published on 2010-04-20. Follow the green link to read the original article .

This article is uploaded by Majbritt Thomsen, administrator on ‘Views On Tourism’.

Knowledge sharing options:
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Add to favorites

Posted in Bhutan, Performance and management, Sustainability.

Integrating Biodiversity into the Tourism Sector

Background to the Case Study
The United Nations Environment Programme’s (UNEP) Biodiversity Planning Support Programme (BPSP) has a mandate to provide assistance to national biodiversity planners as they develop and implement their national biodiversity strategy and action plans, or equivalent plans, programmes and policies.

The integration of biodiversity into other sectors of the national economy and civil society has been identified as a critical indicator of successful implementation of sustainable development practices and objectives of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD).

Tourism is one of the fastest growing economic sectors and has an ecological footprint that reaches to almost every part of the Earth. As such, it has great potential to influence biodiversity conservation and sustainable use, in both positive and negative ways.

Sustainable tourism has been highlighted recently as an area of major concern both within the CBD and was the focus of attention at the recent Conference of parties in Nairobi. In its final decisions, the CoP requested parties to submit case studies of best practise in sustainable tourism

Outside the of the mechanism of the CBD, a large number of other initiatives linking biodiversity and tourism have been undertaken by other organisations, ranging from the World Tourism Organisation and UNESCO to numerous private tourism companies.

Whilst these initiatives are welcome, there is a danger that the sheer volume and diversity of initiatives on biodiversity and tourism becomes a barrier to effective implementation of the right policies at the national level. It has been observed that national biodiversity planners will value any
guidance to assist them to rapidly ‘sift’ through the available information and find that which best suits their particular requirements.

BPSP therefore commissioned this study of the integration of biodiversity into the tourism sector with a specific focus on how best to incorporate ‘global best practice’ into national biodiversity strategy and action plans (NBSAPs). The study has included 12 case studies in selected countries to guide biodiversity planners to the best global information on biodiversity and tourism.

This report presents the findings of the South African Case Study. Download the full report here .

This article is quoted from Tourism ROY Newsletter published on 2010-04-21. Follow the green link to read the original article .

This article is uploaded by Majbritt Thomsen, administrator on ‘Views On Tourism’.

Knowledge sharing options:
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Add to favorites

Posted in Africa, Best practice, Cooperation and network, Development, Education and qualification, Performance and management, Policy, Sustainability.

Euro Financial Trauma: Good or Bad for Sustainable Tourism

The Euro has slumped in value this may well bring big opportunities for regional and international sustainable tourism

The Euro has been dropping like a stone on international markets just today it has dropped to a four year low against the dollar – one dollar can now buy .83 of a Euro and it is possible, although not probable that parity is in sight. The UK£ is also strengthening against the Euro, today it could buy 1.21 Euros.

International tourists are rapidly going to see the 16 countries that use the Euro as the biggest discount stores in the world.

In practical, tourist wallet terms that means 20% off – everything. Whether it’s hotel accommodation, meals, drinks, crafts, souvenirs – everything.

Moreover Europe has the reputation of being a high value, high cost, upmarket destination where tourism is dealt with professionally. So tourists will not see themselves as buying cheap things cheap, but getting real discounts on very high-value experiences.

You can almost hear the cheers from the restaurants and designer shops of Paris to the beaches of Marbella and the delightful islands of the Aegean, where much was done to accelerate the Euro’s drop.

All this is a shot in the arm for European tourism, but what about sustainability?

The fact is that for this opportunity to be economically sustainable (the easy bit!) the following needs to happen:

• Tourists need to spend their dollars, pounds, yens and yuans in locally-owned establishments
• Tourists need to stay in locally-owned hotels and other forms of accommodation (don’t worry if the hotels are actually called Marriott or Holiday Inn or any other global brand – are they locally-owned? And do they provide REAL benefits to locals?)
• Tourists need to eat and drink in establishments that source their food and drink locally.
• Tourists need to travel with transportation companies that have a real commitment to the destination.
• And for the final bit of economic sustainability, local destination enterprises need to know who these tourists are so that they can keep in contact with them and understand their market a bit better every year (yes, just like airlines and tour operators and global distribution networks). Destinations don’t need to own the market, but they do need to have an ongoing relationship with it.
So, that’s the easy bit – the economic sustainability – what about the cultural, social and environmental aspects of sustainability taking advantage of this European harvest of tourists?
European destinations need to go through a paradigm-shift NOW.

They urgently need to recognize that their tourism stock in trade is represented by their environment, their culture, their society – in practical terms their roads, their mountains and valleys, their food and drink, everything that makes up their unique selling proposition – their brand. And, like successful commercial companies, they must enhance the value of their brand, not devalue it by selling it to the most possible buyers.

This is a real opportunity for European destinations – maybe they could learn from really successful global brands who are judged by the benefits they provide to their shareholders rather than the amount of product they shift.

Writer Valere Tjolle is editor of the Sustainable Tourism Report Suite, special offer at: www.travelmole.com/stories/1142003.php

This article is a quoted from Travelmole newsletter from 2010-06-07. To read the original article please follow this link .

This article is uploaded by Majbritt Thomsen, administrator on ‘Views On Tourism’

Knowledge sharing options:
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Add to favorites

Posted in Development, Europe, Market knowledge, Sale and marketing, Sustainability.

Weather and Climate Information for Tourism

Tourism is one of the largest and fastest growing global economic sectors. It is a significant contributor to national and local economies around the world and is increasingly promoted as having an important role in contributing to the UN Millennium Development Goals, particularly the alleviation of poverty in Least Developed Countries (LDCs). The interface between climate and tourism is multifaceted and highly complex. The tourism industry is characterized by considerable diversity, consequently extensive differences exist in climate sensitivity and the abilities of tourism operators worldwide to incorporate climate services into decision making. Weather and climate have broad significance to tourist decision making and the travel experience, significantly influencing travel patterns and expenditures worldwide. For the tourism industry and tourists alike, climate represents both a vital resource to be exploited and an important risk to be managed. Consequently, it is expected that the effects of climate change will have profound impacts on consumer travel demand and tourism businesses and transform destinations. Demands for accurate and increasingly detailed climate information are therefore anticipated to increase substantially in order to the challenges posed by climate change in the decades ahead.

Despite the growing global economic importance of the tourism sector and the complex interactions between climate and tourism, there has been very limited evaluation of the extent to which climate information is used within the tourism sector or how climate information is being integrated into the specific decision-making processes of tourists or the tourism industry. Knowledge of how different tourism sub-sectors and specific businesses are influenced by weather and climate is still relatively unexplored and has hindered the development of specialized climate products and the use of financial instruments to reduce climate risk (weather derivatives and insurance) within the tourism sector. A systematic assessment of climate services needs within the sector has also not been undertaken. Tourism is also virtually absent from the growing literature on the economic and non-market value of climate information and forecasts. There has been limited evaluation of what sources of climate information tourists and tourism operators utilize, or the effectiveness of different communication pathways and formats.

Meteorological networks do not adequately represent the climatic conditions in many mountain, coastal, and island tourism destinations, particularly in developing nations, encumbering climate change adaptation and the development of climate risk management products. Climate information represents a double-edged sword for the tourism sector, for while accurate climate information can be invaluable to the tourism industry, inaccurate climate information that deters visitation is a lament heard often from the tourism industry. The emergence of new specialized climate products for the tourism from private meteorological companies represents important progress, but thus far lacks the transparency needed to properly evaluate their rigor and validity in the international travel marketplace. Improving the provision and use of climate information in the tourism sector is a challenge that will require close collaboration between the climate and tourism research communities (both physical and social scientists), NMSs, government tourism authorities and the tourism industry at the regional level.

The following recommendations are intended to address the key knowledge gaps and facilitate the collaboration that would provide new capacities to enhance decision-making that would reduce climate risk and enable climate change adaptation in the tourism sector.
• Investment is required to strengthen climate monitoring networks in areas where the tourism sector is vital to local economies, specifically rural areas and many developing countries (particularly SIDS), in order to improve climate risk management and climate change adaptation in the tourism sector.
• With the risk of permanent loss of historical climate data in developing countries, which has potentially high value for managing climate risk and informing climate change adaptation, action is urgently needed establish a coordinated international data rescue initiative.
• Strengthening of climate monitoring networks is required to support the development and access to innovative financial products (weather derivatives and index insurance) to manage climate risk in the tourism sector.
• The development of regionally and locally specific climate change scenarios is required to facilitate effective climate change adaptation by the tourism industry and tourism dependent communities. The refinement of near term climate change predictions (covering the next 25-30 years), that are most relevant to business investment and government policy timeframes are particularly encouraged.
• Support is required for the fundamental multi-disciplinary research needed to understand the salience of climate (both in source markets [push factor] and destinations [pull factor]) in different travel decision-making contexts, cross-cultural climate preferences for major destination types, the affect of weather on holiday satisfaction and future travel choices, and the climate sensitivity of major tourism activities.
• Developers of specialized climate products for the tourism sector, whether the private sector, universities or governments, are encouraged to disclose the scientific methodology or market testing results to demonstrate validation in the tourism marketplace.
• The tourism sector, in collaboration with NMS, private meteorological companies, and university researchers, are encouraged to develop accepted standards for specialized climate products, to ensure consistent and accurate communication of climate information to international travellers and to facilitate objective destination comparisons and marketing claims in a global tourism marketplace.
• Collaboration between governments, universities, communities, and the private sector (tourism businesses, meteorological service companies, financial services), must be strengthened to drive innovation that connects climate information to the needs of the tourism sector and tourism dependent communities.
• Greater effort be made to consult with major tourism end-users about their needs for climate information. This consultation must be done regionally in order to adequately represent specific information needs and the capabilities of regional providers.
• The active collaboration of the tourism industry is required to support the development of climate services to improve outcomes for the sector, and they are strongly
encouraged to provide increased access to sectoral data, consult on specific climate information needs and constraints to its use, provide expert review of specialized products and create effective strategies to communicate weather and climate information to tourists.
• An interdisciplinary initiative be established to evaluate the economic and non-market societal value of climate information for decision-making by tourists and tourism operators.
Recommendation: An interdisciplinary evaluation of best practices for communication of climate information, particularly specialized products and forecast uncertainty, to tourism end-users is encouraged.
• A series of multi-objective, capacity-building workshops be initiated in major tourism regions around the world, in order to foster the direct interactions and partnerships between climate service providers and tourism user groups needed to make significant progress in the application of climate information in the tourism sector.
• Training the next generation of tourism professionals to utilize climate information to reduce climate risks and adapt to climatic change in the decades ahead is a priority and it is urged that a ‘Climate Risk Management’ training module be created for use by tourism and hospitality schools around the world.

This article is quoted from the newsletter TourismROI Alert from Tourism ROI. The article was originally published on 2010-05-19.
Follow this link to download the entire report .

This article is uploaded by Majbritt Thomsen, administrator on ‘Views On Tourism’.

Knowledge sharing options:
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Add to favorites

Posted in Development, Education and qualification, Performance and management, Sustainability, World.

Eurodite report: Knowledge Dynamics as a Challenge to Public Policies

EURODITE in brief
The objective of the EURODITE project is to investigate regional trajectories to the knowledge economy by showing how knowledge is generated, developed and transferred within and among firms or organisations and their regional contexts. EURODITE is a multidisciplinary project inclu-ding researchers from economic geography, organisational theory, economics, management theory, business administration, sociology and other disciplines. This means that from a theoreti¬cal and conceptual point of view, the project draws from a multitude of academic disciplines and sources.

In the EURODITE project and in this report, knowledge is understood as a process where certain organisational competences are used to acquire new, economically useful knowledge. Knowledge dynamics is a key concept in the project. Knowledge dynamics are interactions of indi¬vidual actors or groups of actors that learn, search for, or diffuse new knowledge, and apply old and new knowledge in the economy. This includes many activities like: employment of knowledge workers; education; training; consulting; in- and out-sourcing. A result of knowledge dynamics may be an innovation in, for instance, a new or improved product (good or service), organisation or pro-cess

In the empirical case studies of EURODITE, research into knowledge dynamics has been conducted. The empirical case studies are based on the following building blocks: regions, sec¬tors, territorial knowledge dynamics and firm-level knowledge dynamics. Better understanding of the way that knowledge is developed within various sectors and types of businesses, how it is transferred, and the role of regional contexts, such as public actors, higher education institutions and networks of firms suggest ways that policies may be developed and used to facilitate knowl¬edge dynamics. This in turn can contribute to increased regional competitiveness.

In EURODITE 22 regions in 13 countries have been studied. The reason for starting from a region is that the regional level has been considered crucial in the development of a more com¬petitive Europe. However, in EURODITE it is assumed that knowledge dynamics are not restricted to bounded territories such as administrative regions. Instead, the assumption is that knowledge interactions stretch across administrative borders. Nonetheless, the regional context appears to play a role in knowledge interactions, for instance, in discussion of policies, thus regions are the starting point for the empirical case studies.

Seven strategic sectors formed the basis for the selection of empirical case studies in
EURODITE:
• Automotives
• Biotechnology
• New media
• Food and drink
• Information and communication technologies (ICT)
• Knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS)
• Tourism

The sectors include high-, medium- and low-tech companies. An assumption here was that the sectors would represent different kinds of knowledge dynamics in both goods and service produc¬tion. However, it is important to stress that the predefined sectors were only meant as a basis for the empirical case study, and we see that many innovations and knowledge interactions tend to occur across sectors.

This article is quoted from the report Knowledge dynamics, regional development and public policy Edited by Henrik Halkier, Margareta Dahlström, Laura James, Jesper Manniche & Lise Smed Olsen.
Read more about the project Eurodite

The article is uploaded by Majbritt Thomsen, administrator on ‘Views On Tourism’.

Knowledge sharing options:
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Add to favorites

Posted in Best practice, Cooperation and network, Development, Europe, Performance and management.

Habitat loss, biodiversity loss

Our planet is changing continuously, causing habitats to be altered and modified. Tropial and sub-tropial forests are always subject to destructive natural forces -cyclones landslides, floods, mud flows, volcanic eruptions, fire, drought, and climate change. These factors are overwhelmed by anthropogenic disturbances. These forests are being logged everywhere at a very high rate. Approximately 50% of forest lands have no forest coverage because of human activities. Deforestation is not a recent human activity in the tropical forests. These were inhabited by humans thousands years back. Charcoal deposits indicate human activity in the sediments of many tropical forests which we know as virgin forests. Granules of various starchy root vegetables were found on 5000 – 7000-year-old stone grinding tools of Panama, indicating that people were cultivating agricultural crops in forests from ancient time (Piperno et al., 2000).

Habitat destruction in global context
The mega biodiversity hotspots of the world contain a high degree of endemism and are undergoing gradual loss of habitats. Maximum portion of these hotspots are located in tropical forests, which are considered as the most endangered. Habitat degradation is one of the major causes of the biodiversity loss. The mega hotspots now consist of only 10% of their former area and 12% of their former primary vegetation. About 1.8% (in Amazonian forests, probably 2.6%) of the tropical forests is disappearing annually. These rates indicate that one Florida per year is being destroyed; one football field is logged per second. The highest rate of deforestation is occurring in South Asia, where 70% of the areas have been deforested. All tropical forests of South Asia will disappear in less than 50 years if the same rate of deforestation continues. The hotspots will lose 40% of their species if current rates of habitat loss continue, even if for only another decade. These forests will not last beyond the mid-21st century. Plain land forests like Sal forests of Bangladesh are the most threatened because of their accessibility and many useful products – timber, rattan, fruits. Many of the protected forests exist only on paper. They are small and fragmented, which is detrimental to their continued existence and to the preservation of biodiversity. Many areas are being reforested but these hardly begin to compensate for losses, and they are nothing like the original forest. The new “forests” are simply tree plantations without any of the diversity or richness of the original forest. The destruction of the habitats for most native species is a worse threat than hunting by humans. Usually hunting targets a few individual animals, but habitat destruction affects all species in an area. Habitat loss occurs in three ways: 1)Whole ecosystems are destroyed or converted into farmland, exotic forests and settlements; 2)Ecosystems are partially removed, creating ‘islands’ surrounded by farmland; 3) Ecosystems are degraded by the loss of species and disruption of their ecological processes. Habitats can either disappear completely or they may become degraded and/or fragmented. Loss of natural forests and the fragmentation of remaining areas into progressively smaller patches is a significant global trend. The habitat degradation occurs in different ways, like in patches (e.g.), in waves (e.g. by urbanization) or linear (e.g. by construction of roads).

Causes of habitat destruction
The tropical forests are often regarded as useless unless “developed” by conversion for agriculture or exploited as sources of wood or rubber. They are also treated as vast sources of land for the relief of social pressures and incomes for the poverty-stricken. The costs of such deforestation are ignored or seen as tolerable in comparison to “non-utilization.” The following factors are involved for the habitat destruction in the tropics: 1) over-population, 2) faulty land ownership pattern, 3) shifting cultivation, 4) illegal and commercial logging, 5) high demand of timber, 6) scarcity of fuel wood, 7) high extraction of non-wood products, 8) destruction of natural vegetation, 9) soil disturbances, 10) inadequate valuation of forests as resources, 11) inadequate protection, 12) establishment of infrastructures and transport networks, 13) extractive activities, 14) inappropriate interventions, 15) construction of dams for hydropower sources, 16) poverty, 17) excessive extraction of non-timbering plants, 18) lack of philosophical and ethical attitudes, 18) animal grazing, 19) litter sweeping, 20) encroachment and land grabbing, 21) economic attitudes, 22) greed and corruption, 23 social structures, 24) wars and social conflicts, 25) tourism, 26) introduction of exotic species, 27) overexploitation; and 28) brick field.

Consequences of habitat destruction
The consequences of the habitat destruction are: 1) deforestation; 2) losing of existing species; 3) decreasing vegetation coverage; 4) accelerating soil erosion; 5) loss of species richness; 6) increasing rarity; 7) loss of genetic diversity; 8) loss of evolutionary potential; 9) changes in water cycles; 10) changes in water tables; 11) conversion in pure stands; 12) difficulty in aforestation; 13) destruction of natural regeneration, 14) climate change; 15) increasing of physical disturbances; 16) loss of ecosystem services, 17) disruption of livelihoods of indigenous people; 18) social instabilities, 19) economic losses; 20) increasing susceptibility of pathogen infection and insect infestation; 21) loss of forest productivity; 22) decreasing of forest non-wood products; 24) increasing of environmental refugees; and 25) affecting habitats in proximity to degraded habitat.

Relationship between habitat loss and biodiversity loss
The exact relationship between deforestation rates and loss of biodiversity is unknown. There are many factors in this complex relationship. The removal of a few trees or a few species from a forest may cause a cascade of species losses due to changes in microenvironment. The removal of a” keystone” species may cause disruption of the highly complex interrelationships among species. Extinction rates depend on many factors such as forest type, soil type, level of anthropogenic disturbances, degree of endemism, extent of land degradation, and so forth. When forests become more fragmented and isolated, the organisms in them are finding it increasingly difficult to survive. Small populations will be unlikely to persevere as their environments change and they are exposed to increasing hunting/gathering pressures and stress. Both population size and species richness decrease as the habitat abundance decreases. Rare and patchily distributed species requiring a large range seem particularly susceptible to habitat destruction. Larger patches contain more species than do small patches. Small fragments experience more extinction and receive fewer immigrants. Small fragments or islands that are more remote from the mainland or source population have fewer species because the extinction rate is the same but the immigration rate is lower. Most of the species are composed of relatively few individuals, randomly distributed throughout the geographical range of that species, or located in one small area only (endemism). Many tropical forest species require large and undisturbed forest; they cannot thrive in degraded habitats. The fragmented forests do not contain the full range of forest species. About 50% of the world’s species are threatened with extinction due to deforestation. Tropical deforestation involves the conversion of continuous forest to the remnant of forest patches set in a matrix of non-forest vegetation. The altered microclimate becomes unsuitable for certain species by increasing mortality rates near the edge and reducing recruitment to their populations. The tropical forest ecosystem is often characterized by a heavy dependency on mutualistic species interactions for its stability. Many plant species in the tropical forests are reliant on animals as agents of dispersal for either pollen or seeds or both. Habitat destruction causes the extinction of certain important pollinating or seed-dispersing animals which severely limits regeneration of rare plant species and hence initiates an extinction vortex. Heavily fragmented forests do not support a home range for larger species. Larger species may have trouble finding habitat in not sufficient density to support a home range in heavily fragmented forests. Fragment size, degree of isolation and time since excision from the continuous forest directly influence the biodiversity of a fragmented habitat. Species also tend to suffer from genetic drift and inbreeding in degraded habitat. Immigration is an important phenomenon for the maintenance of high local levels of diversity in tropical forests. In distant fragments the rare species will die out relatively rapidly and not be replaced by other species because of a failure of immigration. Fragment edges are inhospitable to most of the forest species. The deforested matrix of a fragmented landscape is often dominated by alien species, because few of the native species are tolerant of the extremely exposed conditions in the exposed areas. Habitat loss is the primary cause of species endangerment.
Habitat loss and biodiversity loss in Bangladesh
Huge population pressure and widespread poverty are main frontier of habitat degradation in Bangladesh. Due to high population density and sharply skewed distribution of lands, the forest resources are overexploited. Per capita forestland in the country is around 0.02 ha and the existing natural forests are decreasing at a rate varying from 2.1% /yr to 3.3% /yr. Massive habitat destruction occurred in the Sal forests of Bangladesh. The recurrent anthropogenic disturbances in the Sal forests have rendered the system inhospitable for the regeneration and growth of wild plant associates, causing a net loss in plant diversity. No single part of the Sal forests can be found as undisturbed natural forest. Logging, regeneration destruction, litter sweeping, animal grazing and soil disturbances are common in all forest areas. Recreational activities like picnic are an additional human pressure in the Sal forests. One can hardly find native species such as Gandhigajari, Ajuli, Dud Kuruj, Sonalu, Cheshra, Jiga, Jogini Chakra, Kaika, Sidha, Sajna, Amloki, Bohera, Roina, Lalmoina, Tamal, Khailadamor, Haldu, Bhutum,Kurchi, Mohuya, Kharajora, Kanaidinga, Kukurchita, Katakhai, Udhal, Sheora, Pahariamra, Awal, Koroch, Bajna, Joina, Debdaru, Arjun and Behula. The hydro-electricity project, ethnic conflict, encroachment, jhum cultivation are the main causes of hill deforestation. Poverty, profit-making, natural disaster, salinity and sedimentation are the major causes of Sundarbans degradation. The vast degradation of Sundari trees is also caused by high salinity. Different types of disease of the trees are also accountable for the deforestation in the Sunderbans. Illegal logging is also responsible for the deforestation in the Sundarbans. Lack of alternative livelihood push the coastal people to depend on mangrove forest products. Hog deer, water buffalo, swamp deer, Javan rhinoceros, single horned rhinoceros and the mugger crocodile became extinct at the beginning of the last century from Sundarbans due to habitat destruction.

Different studies show that all our natural old forests have become critically fragmented to the point where they are considered unlikely to maintain rich level of biodiversity, nor support viable populations of natural and native species of flora and fauna. Abundant species has become occasional, occasional become rare, rare become very rare and very rare become extinct. Once upon a time, Sal forests of Bangladesh were sweet home of beautiful Capped Langur. Now it is threatened by habitat loss and has become an IUCN- red listed species. Less than a hundred years ago, tigers prowled all across the Indian sub-continent. But increasing habitat loss has contracted the tiger’s former range. Tigers need large territories for roaming and preying. About 95% population of Western Hoolock Gibbons in Bangladesh will be lost over the next two decades based on the current effects of habitat destruction. Now Asian Elephant is the largest critically endangered terrestrial animal in Bangladesh. The major cause of the decline in the wild elephant population in Bangladesh is habitat destruction. There has been rampant habitat loss of Marbled and Fishing Cat throughout the Sal forests over the past 20 years. Habitat destruction throughout South Asia is occurring at an alarming rate to the peril of biodiversity.

Necessity of habitat conservation
The core of ‘The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)’ is the promotion of an integrated approach to natural resource management on large landscapes and to biodiversity conservation through enhancing wildlife habitat and reducing habitat fragmentation. 1) Conservation of biodiversity; 2) extracting forest products; 3) preserving genetic resources; 4) maintaining hydrological functions; 5) improving air quality, 6) stabilizing climate; 7) retention of soil fertility; 8) controlling pests; 9) proper pollination; 10) aesthetic factors and recreation; 11) wilderness; and 12) ethical values.

Mitigation
* Reducing human population growth
* Improving land use pattern
* Sustainable forest development
* Introducing biological corridors
* Maintaining buffer zones in between core and peripheral zones
* Changing policies towards forests
* Involving indigenous peoples and traditional communities in conservation programme
* Protecting forest lands
* Strengthening forest monitoring, research and development, education, and capacity building to maintain a “cradle” of biodiversity within the core areas of each protected forests
* Improving agricultural methods and productivity
* Improving legal systems
* Stopping of the introduction of alien invasive species
* Gap filling by rare tree species
* Aforestation and reforestation by native and natural species
* Facilitating natural regeneration in degraded forests
* Leaving denuded forest lands as untouched for 20 years to promote natural succession of forests
* Stopping further clear felling and illegal logging
* Protecting natural regenerations (seedling, sapling and juvenile trees) from cutting
* Introducing pioneer and early successional species in the degraded forests
* Taking effective actions against the encroachers and land grabbers
* Establishing gene banks to conserve the gene pool of endangered species
* Bringing endangered animals in captivity for breeding
* Reducing social and economical imbalances
* Minimizing anthropogenic disturbances
* Establishing national centers for the conservation of threatened and endangered species
* Increasing of basic research on the impact of forest degradation
* Considering conservation programme as an asset in economic calculations
* Reforming trade policies
* Taking appropriate actions against animal poaching
* Poverty alleviation in the adjacent areas of forests
* Emphasizing on community based conservation
* Establishing more protected areas
* Searching for alternative fuel sources in the forest areas
* Creating alternative livelihoods for the indigenous people
* Initiating Rehabilitation programme for the illegal loggers
* Improving environmental education
* Taking care of secondary and successional forests

Dr. Md. Mizanur Rahman is a biodiversity specialist, Assistant Commissioner, Jhalakathi Collectorate. E-mail: mizan_peroj @yahoo.com

Knowledge sharing options:
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Add to favorites

Posted in Bangladesh, Development, Performance and management.

Cooperation among stakeholders in tourism sector vital


Majbrith Thomsen making a presentation on tourism on june 22. TOAB officials are also seen. Photo: Monitor

Dhaka : Tourism industry in Bangladesh with its eco-natural beauty, world renow-ned sea beach, mangrove forest and unique culture, is developing, but cooperation among stakeholders is vital for flourishing sustainable tourism here.

Majbrith Tho-msen, initiator of “Views on Tourism project” was addressing a seminar on “How to Develop Sustainable Tourism industry in Bang-ladesh” organised by Tour Operators Association of Bangladesh at Washington Hotel in the city on June 22.

Taufiq Uddin Ahmed, President, Hasan Mansur, Immediate Past President, Faridul Haque, Adviser, Syed Golam Kadir, Director, International Affairs, TOAB were present on the occasion, among others.

Thomsen, a Danish citizen living in Dhaka since 2007 and working for the development of tourism in Bangladesh, said her project’s vision was to encourage sustainable tourism movement in Bangladesh and South Asia and aimed to provide knowledge and networking amo-ng the stakeholders in this industry in Bangladesh.

She said there were more than 300 articles available on the “Views on Tourism” website and the online resource was open for use of any tourism organisation. She also reminded those present at the seminar on the positive and negative aspects of tourism industry.

This article is quoted from The Bangladeshi Monitor. Read the original article published July 5th 2010.

The article is uploaded by Majbritt Thomsen, administrator on ‘Views On Tourism’.

Please join the online Views On Tourism network and discussion group in order to achieve personal goals as well as encourage a sustainable tourism development in Bangladesh and South Asia. Read more about this group and how to become a member here.

Knowledge sharing options:
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Add to favorites

Posted in Bangladesh, Cooperation and network, Education and qualification, Events, Performance and management, Sustainability.

Sheet No. 8: Policy instruments supporting Pro-Poor Tourism

This PPT Information Sheet is intended to highlight the role of government in maximizing the poverty impact of tourism. It is true that tourism is an industry that is driven by the private sector, however there is much that governments can do to shape the way in which it develops and a number of different policy measures that can be used at different levels to enhance its impacts on the ‘poor’.

National policy framework

It is not just tourism policy that influences the development of the industry in any particular destination – in fact, many countries where tourism occurs do not have a tourism policy. Tourism influences and is influence by broader economic development strategies and sectoral policies. Ensuring the national policy framework supports Pro-Poor Tourism requires:
• Regional economic policies, rural regeneration policies, and local land-use planning that include a realistic assessment of the potential for tourism, and identified ways to develop it at priority sites. Devolution of rights and revenue fees across levels of government that provide incentives, not discouragement, for councils and local bodies to invest in tourism.
• A national economic policy framework that includes realistic assessment of comparative advantages of tourism.
• Coherence and effective institutional linkages between the tourism ministry or division and economic development ministries.

Poverty reduction strategies and other elements of a poverty programme that address how to make the structure of national growth more pro-poor, and increase investment in Pro-Poor Tourism measures are reported in Infosheet No 9.

Land policy in particular is critical. Communities with secure land tenure are in the strongest position to manage tourism on their land and gain the lion’s share of benefits. Pro-Poor Tourism case studies have shown that “extent to which economic empowerment of local communities takes place is intricately linked to the nature and extent of the land rights of those rural communities.” (see Pro-Poor Tourism Strategies: Making Tourism Work For The Poor, PPT Report N. 1, p. 42, 2001).

Land ownership, while desirable, is not essential – there are a number of institutional arrangements whereby communities can gain rights over tourism resources without necessarily owning land. The apparent fluidity of land tenure can be as important as the current status, as uncertainty deters private investment. A PPT case study in South Africa notes “for investors, the perceived risk of investing in areas with unclear land rights is high. Investors price for this risk which may impact on the anticipated financial returns from the project and thus benefit flows to the community” (see Practical strategies for Pro-Poor Tourism. Case studies of Makuleke and Manyeleti tourism initiative, PPT Working Papers N.2, p. 44, 2001).

This article is quoted from the newsletter TourismROI Alert from Tourism ROI. The article was originally published on 2010-06-12.
Follow this link to download the entire report.

This article is uploaded by Majbritt Thomsen, administrator on ‘Views On Tourism’.

Knowledge sharing options:
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Add to favorites

Posted in Best practice, Performance and management, Policy, Sustainability, World.

PATA: Boom for Asia Pacific

International arrivals to Asia Pacific surged 10% in the first quarter of 2010

The Pacific Asia Travel Association (PATA) announced the international visitor arrivals results for the first quarter of 2010 today. Travel demand in Asia Pacific* picked up strongly in the first quarter of the year, registering a 10% increase from the same quarter in 2009.

International visitor arrivals to South Asia grew by 17% year-on-year in the first quarter. All the destinations in the sub-region rebounded strongly from the relatively poor first quarter of 2009, which, in the cases of India and Sri Lanka, were severely impacted by the lingering effects of the Mumbai attacks and the civil war, respectively. Arrivals growth was also very strong for Nepal (+30%), the Maldives (+21%) and Bhutan (+57%) during the first three months of this year.

The destinations of Southeast Asia also reported strong growth with a collective gain of 16% year-on-year in the first quarter. This was boosted by double-digit growth in international arrivals to Cambodia (+10%), Indonesia (+15%), Myanmar (+39%), Singapore (+20%), Thailand (+28%) and Vietnam (+36%). Thailand recorded a 28% gain in arrivals January to March however it is expected that this early recovery will be severely impacted by the tensions and unrest in April and May, especially in Bangkok and it’ s immediate surrounds.

Within Northeast Asia, China (PRC) reported a 4% increase in international arrivals in the first quarter of 2010 with the sub-region as a whole, growing by 8% year-on-year for the period. This strong sub-regional performance was also supported by the SARs of Hong Kong (+17%) and Macau (+12%), Chinese Taipei (+28%) and Japan (+29%). The turn-around for Japan was particularly solid given that it came from a 19% slump in calendar year 2009. Korea (ROK), on the other hand, recorded a 1% decline in arrivals in the first quarter of the year, reversing the positive trends seen in 2009.

International arrivals to the Pacific grew by 6% during the first quarter of 2010, dominated by a 6% increase in visitor numbers to the higher volume destinations of Australia and New Zealand. A number of the smaller Pacific island destinations also recorded improvements in arrivals numbers, notably Niue (+79%), Fiji (+26%), Papua New Guinea (+22%), Tuvalu (+7%), Palau (+6%) and Northern Marianas (+2%).

This article is quoted from the newsletter PATAnews from PATA . Follow the green link to read the original article published on 2010.06.23.

This article is uploaded by Majbritt Thomsen, administrator on ‘Views On Tourism’.

Please join the online Views On Tourism network and discussion group in order to achieve personal goals as well as encourage a sustainable tourism development in Bangladesh and South Asia. Read more about this group and how to become a member here.

Knowledge sharing options:
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Add to favorites

Posted in Asia, Development, Market knowledge.